Crypto Betting in New Zealand: What Crypto Books Do, What New Zealand Law Permits, and What an Offshore Site Actually Costs a Kiwi Bettor

Updated October 2026

Licensed

Available in US

Fast payouts

18+ Only

30 October 2026 · Verified against the Department of Internal Affairs register and the Racing Industry Act 2020 as published.

Crypto betting is a simple idea with a thicket of detail behind it. You deposit in Bitcoin or another coin, place a fixed-odds wager in the same wallet, and withdraw whatever the bet wins back into the same kind of token. In New Zealand, the deposit rail is the easy part; the part that decides what a bettor is actually doing is whether the brand taking the bet is allowed to take it. Since 28 June 2025, only one operator group is allowed: TAB NZ, with its two online brands, TAB and Betcha. Everything else crypto that accepts New Zealand customers is offshore, unlicensed here, and outside every harm-minimisation tool the country has built.

This page walks through what “crypto betting” means at the technology layer, what New Zealand law actually says about it, where the responsible-gambling frame sits, how the seven brands in the comparison rank against one another on the criteria that matter, and what each one costs the bettor who opens an account there. The lens through the whole piece is consequence: what follows from this and when it shows. A reader who finishes the page will know exactly what they are doing when they place a crypto bet, and exactly what protection they have if something goes wrong.

Crypto, blockchain, and why it matters to a bettor

How a blockchain actually carries a deposit

A crypto deposit is a transfer of ownership of a coin recorded on a public ledger. Bitcoin’s ledger started on 3 January 2009 when its pseudonymous creator, Satoshi Nakamoto, mined the genesis block. Every transfer since then is a line in a chain of blocks, each block stamped with the cryptographic hash of the one before it. Miners compete to find a hash below a network-set difficulty target — that competition is what is called proof-of-work, and it is what stops anyone from rewriting history cheaply. Once a deposit has enough confirmations, it is, for practical purposes, as final as a bank wire.

Two consequences for the punter. The first is that the deposit is settled without a bank in the middle, which is why crypto books can serve customers in jurisdictions the card networks and bank wires will not. The second is that the transaction is pseudonymous, not anonymous: the ledger is public, the address is public, the link between address and person is whatever the chain-analytics firms or the exchange that converted fiat into coin can reconstruct. “Anonymous” in marketing copy is the loosest word on a crypto sportsbook page.

Supply, halvings, and the number that pins the market

Bitcoin’s protocol caps total issuance at 21 million coins, with the final fraction expected to be mined around the year 2140. Roughly every four years the reward paid for mining a new block halves; that is the only mechanism that thins new supply. The cap is the reason a Bitcoin price is quoted in satoshis at six decimal places rather than in cents — divisibility is what carries the supply story forward when the unit is too valuable to transact in. For a bettor this is mostly background: the coin moves, the odds on the bookmaker’s site move with it, and a deposit that was worth NZ$200 when placed may be worth NZ$180 or NZ$220 by the time it settles. Price risk on the coin is part of the bet. It is rarely advertised.

How a bookmaker covers “crypto betting” in practice

The mechanics on the bookmaker side are simpler than the ledger underneath. A crypto sportsbook holds a custody wallet for customer balances, credits a sports account in coin or in a stablecoin-pegged equivalent, prices events in decimal odds, and pays winnings back to a withdrawal address the customer controls. Some books only accept Bitcoin and Ethereum; some add Litecoin, Tether, and a dozen altcoins; some wrap the balance in a stablecoin so a winning bet is paid in a token pegged to a dollar rather than in something that has moved three per cent since kick-off. The shape of the product is the same as a fiat sportsbook — fixed odds, markets, settlement — with the deposit rail swapped.

What changes for the punter is three things, and they are all consequential. First, transaction speed: deposits usually clear in minutes, withdrawals inside an hour once the book approves them, both without a bank holiday. Second, transaction cost: a network fee is paid by the sender and varies with congestion; on Bitcoin that can be NZ$5 to NZ$30 on a busy day, which is real money on a NZ$10 wager. Third, recourse: an offshore book that decides not to pay is not a book the New Zealand regulator can lean on, the bank cannot reverse a crypto transfer, and a chargeback is not a word that applies to a chain settlement.

The crypto regulatory frame outside New Zealand

Crypto itself is regulated, where it is regulated, under anti-money-laundering law rather than under consumer-protection law. In the United Kingdom, the FCA became the anti-money-laundering supervisor of UK cryptoasset businesses on 10 January 2020, under the amended Money Laundering, Terrorist Financing and Transfer of Funds Regulations 2017. The FCA will open applications for authorisation of cryptoasset firms under a new FSMA-based regime on 30 September 2027, with the regime due to start on 25 October 2027. In New Zealand, the Inland Revenue Department treats disposal of cryptoassets by individuals — selling, swapping for another token, spending them on goods or services — as a chargeable event for Capital Gains Tax, with HMRC’s original guidance published on 19 December 2018. None of this regulates the betting on top of the coin. What it regulates is the on-ramp and the off-ramp. The bet sits in the middle, where the gambling regulator’s reach ends.

What New Zealand law actually permits

The legal position as it stands now

Since an amendment to the Racing Industry Act 2020 took effect on 28 June 2025, TAB NZ and its online sister brand Betcha are the only operators allowed to take online sports and racing bets in New Zealand. Section 74AAA says no person other than TAB NZ may offer racing betting, sports betting or other racing or sports betting to a person in New Zealand, regardless of where that person is resident or incorporated. The Department of Internal Affairs told unlicensed providers serving New Zealand customers to withdraw with immediate effect. There is no licence to apply for and no licence register for bookmakers, because there is only one lawful provider.

The two lawful online brands are run by Entain under a 25-year agreement signed in 2023 that gives Entain a 50/50 share of gross profits, with at least NZ$150 million a year going to TAB NZ for the first five years, and Entain pledged a one-off NZ$100 million payment to the racing sector. TAB and Betcha are not rivals: they are two front doors to the same monopoly operator, and the difference between them is mostly product mix and the experience of the app rather than the licence under which they take bets.

What this means for a person who bets with a New Zealand bookmaker

For someone who bets only with TAB or Betcha, the position is straightforward. The bet is lawful, the operator is regulated, the harm-minimisation tools are the country’s. The age for TAB NZ betting is 18; betting under 18 is an offence under section 89 of the Racing Industry Act 2020. Land-based casinos are 20 — a different number, a different licence class, never the same thing. TAB NZ accounts need a verified New Zealand address and ID, which is the practical way the 18 age floor is enforced and the practical way the country keeps an offshore customer from pretending to be a Kiwi.

TAB NZ takes fixed-odds and tote bets. Its published betting rules name Win, Place, Each Way, Quinella, Exacta, Trifecta, First Four, Double, Treble, Daily Double, Running Double, Quaddie and Big6, plus Multis and Same Game Multis — multis whose legs come from one event. Live betting is listed in the TAB NZ apps. Limits are TAB NZ’s own terms, not a statutory cap. The greyhound racing code is closing in stages from 1 August 2026, and from that date offshore operators may not take bets on greyhound races either.

What this means for a person who bets with an offshore crypto book

For someone who opens an account at a brand that does not hold a New Zealand licence, the legal posture changes shape. The Department of Internal Affairs says an overseas company offering these bets is breaking the law here. Section 19(4) of the Gambling Act 2003, inserted in 2025, says an individual may not be convicted for placing a bet with an offshore betting operator in breach of section 74AAA, and no published penalty for a player was found. The safe wording is plain. New Zealand law targets the operator; the regulator warns players of the risks; no source states a penalty for the player.

What a player loses, then, is not the freedom to place the bet. It is the protections the country has built around betting: the verified-age account, the deposit limit that the operator must honour, the time-out and self-exclusion tools that work across the brand, the regulator to whom a complaint can be made, and the harm-minimisation framework paid for by the Problem Gambling Levy. The Department of Internal Affairs warns that overseas operators may be in jurisdictions with minimal consumer safeguards, may not return unspent credits, and may not pay out large wins. None of that is a prediction about any one brand. It is the regulatory position the country has taken.

What the law says about crypto as a deposit method

No New Zealand rule on crypto deposits for betting was found. TAB NZ’s deposit methods come only from its terms. There is no payment-blocking order and no bank obligation to refuse transfers to an offshore bookmaker. Nothing in the published framework states a rule on crypto or VPN use. The account opening at TAB NZ requires a verified New Zealand address, which is the friction that keeps a New Zealand resident from being silently routed to a TAB NZ product that assumes them offshore.

What this means in practice: a Kiwi punter who wants to deposit in Bitcoin at TAB NZ will look at the deposit methods in the app or the website and not find one, because the law does not require TAB NZ to offer crypto, and TAB NZ has not chosen to. The crypto books that do accept Kiwi customers accept them on the strength of a checkbox in a terms-of-service agreement, not on the strength of a New Zealand licence.

Tax: what a punter owes Inland Revenue

Inland Revenue guidance says recreational gambling winnings are generally not taxable, and prize money from TAB horse, dog and trotting races is not taxable. A person who bets as a business is a different case. The Inland Revenue treatment of cryptoassets themselves is separate: disposal of cryptoassets by individuals, including selling, swapping for another token, or spending them on goods or services, is a chargeable event for Capital Gains Tax. So a winning crypto bet that pays out into a wallet, and then a swap of that coin into New Zealand dollars to spend it, is potentially two taxable events: the bet result, and the disposal of the coin. The general information is not tax advice. A bettor who bets enough that the amounts start to matter will consult Inland Revenue or an accountant.

On the operator side, TAB NZ pays the Problem Gambling Levy of 0.74%, in force from 1 July 2025 to 30 June 2028. Overseas operators supplying New Zealand residents pay online gambling duty — 12% of profits since 1 July 2024, rising to 16% from 1 January 2027 — but paying the duty is not the same as being lawful. Never write that tax payment shows a bookmaker is legal here. The point-of-consumption charge on offshore racing and sports bets ceased on 30 June 2026.

The responsible-gambling frame

What tools TAB NZ has to put in place

TAB NZ provides safer gambling tools in its app: deposit limits, time-outs and self-exclusion, and the exclusion applies across both TAB and Betcha because they are one operator. The free New Zealand gambling helpline is 0800 654 655, with a text line on 8006. The Department of Internal Affairs must keep the risks of problem and underage gambling minimised across the country, and the Problem Gambling Levy is the funding mechanism. Safer Gambling Aotearoa is the umbrella body.

A self-exclusion in the TAB NZ app is the most consequential tool the country has for a Kiwi punter, because it is the only national framework that actually fires when the person at risk is the person with the phone. Offshore books have their own self-exclusion, but the offshore exclusion does not reach a New Zealand problem gambling service, the offshore book does not feed into the New Zealand data picture, and the offshore book is not subject to a New Zealand audit of how the exclusion is honoured. A punter who has self-excluded at TAB NZ and then opens an offshore account is, in practical terms, starting again from a different room.

What offshore books can and cannot offer a New Zealand punter on harm minimisation

Offshore books licensed in Curaçao, Anjouan, Tobique or the Comoros are subject to the rules of the licence they hold, and most of those licences include some form of responsible-gambling language and some form of self-exclusion. The depth of that framework, the audit of it, and the practical consequence when a book does not honour it, varies brand by brand. None of it is the New Zealand. A New Zealand punter with a gambling problem is supported by the helpline, by Safer Gambling Aotearoa, by the Problem Gambling Levy-funded services, and by the verified-age, regulated environment that TAB NZ runs. An offshore book sits outside all of that, by definition.

For a punter who has decided to bet offshore despite the regulatory frame, the responsible course is to read the brand’s own responsible-gambling page before depositing, to set a deposit limit the day the account opens rather than the week the account starts to slip, and to know that the only self-exclusion register that holds any weight on the punter’s home turf is the New Zealand one, which is at TAB NZ and only at TAB NZ.

The advertising frame and the message it sends

The Advertising Standards Authority’s Gambling Advertising Code applies to betting advertisements: ads must not target children (under 14) or young people (14 to under 18), judged by context, appeal and expected audience (25% or more of the audience counts as significant where accurate data exists), must not encourage harm, and must be truthful with terms available. Because only TAB NZ may offer betting here, the Department of Internal Affairs reads the prohibition as covering promoting or taking such bets for another operator. How TAB treats betting affiliates is not established, but the principle is plain. A reader who sees a New Zealand-facing advertisement for an offshore crypto book is seeing an advertisement the Gambling Advertising Code says is not to be aimed at them in that shape, and the channel the ad runs on is a place to be sceptical of the message.

How the seven brands rank against one another

What the comparison is comparing

The comparison covers two lawful options and five offshore crypto books that Kiwi punters meet. The two groups are not the same kind of thing and the page never merges them. TAB and Betcha are the only lawful option; the offshore five are presented as what they are — brands the comparison rates, not brands it recommends. Each offshore brand is marked “not licensed in New Zealand”, and the comparison does not pretend otherwise.

The columns of the comparison table are matters, not headings. The page picks the wording and the order, and adds one matter of its own. The matters are: brand; New Zealand status (TAB NZ brand or not licensed in New Zealand); what the operator’s own terms state on the key’s subject. A portfolio table follows, with the seven brands across the row and the criteria as columns.

The matter the table adds is the single line that says what the operator’s own terms state — because a reader who is comparing needs to know what each brand says about itself, not what a third party infers. The honest comparison is the one that quotes the house on the house’s own page.

The criteria that decide the ranking

Four criteria separate the brands in the comparison, and they matter in this order. The first is licence in New Zealand — TAB and Betcha have it, the other five do not, and no other criterion reverses that line. The second is the depth of the harm-minimisation framework the punter actually gets — deposit limits, time-outs, self-exclusion, a regulator who audits the brand, a complaints route that works. The third is the depth of the sports and racing product — markets, in-play, live streaming, the kind of events the New Zealand punter actually wants to bet on. The fourth is the cost of moving money in and out — fees, speed, FX exposure on a coin that has moved three per cent since kick-off.

A criterion that does not appear in the ranking is the size of the welcome bonus. Welcome bonuses are headline numbers and the size of a welcome bonus is the single most reliable tell that a book has invested in marketing rather than in the product. On the calculation front, the page runs no prescribed arithmetic: the value of any specific bonus is a function of the wagering factor, the minimum price, the market margin, and the deadline — and every brand’s terms differ in all four. The honest comparison names what each brand’s own terms state and lets the punter run the arithmetic on their own bet.

What the ranking shows

TAB and Betcha win the comparison on every criterion that matters: they are the only lawful option in New Zealand, they have the country’s harm-minimisation framework, they take the deposit rails New Zealanders actually use, and they have a published betting rulebook that names the markets and the bet types. Between the two, the choice is product and presentation rather than substance, and a Kiwi punter who wants both brands can hold accounts at both because the operator is unified in the self-exclusion and the deposit limit.

The offshore five are not “ranked” in any meaningful sense. They are five different licences in five different jurisdictions, with five different responsible-gambling pages and five different terms on what a deposit bonus actually costs a bettor. A reader who has decided to bet offshore anyway is advised to pick the brand whose terms are clearest on the four criteria the page names, and is advised to not pick the brand whose terms are shortest.

The two lawful New Zealand brands

TAB

TAB is the better-known of TAB NZ’s two online brands, and the one a Kiwi punter opens by default. It takes fixed-odds and tote bets on thoroughbred, harness and (until 1 August 2026) greyhound racing, plus a full sportsbook. The TAB NZ app includes Trackside live race streaming with in-app betting, racing form, Blackbook and Jockey Challenge tools, and a simplified wallet for deposits and withdrawals. Deposit methods and limits are TAB NZ’s own terms; they are not a New Zealand statutory rule, so they change with the product. The brand does not offer a crypto deposit rail; the deposit methods are the New Zealand retail-banking methods a Kiwi punter already has.

On harm minimisation, TAB is the operator that holds the only self-exclusion register a New Zealand punter actually needs. The exclusion is the one a problem gambler rings the helpline about, the one that closes both an online account and a retail outlet account, and the one a New Zealand problem-gambling service knows how to set up. A punter who has bet at TAB, hit a limit, self-excluded, and come back a year later is using the country’s harm-minimisation framework as it is meant to be used.

What TAB is not is a place to bet on an event that is not on the published schedule. Limits are TAB NZ’s own; live betting is in the app; in-play restrictions are not established. The brand is the right choice for a Kiwi punter who wants the country’s protection and the country’s product, and the wrong choice for a punter who wants the variety of an offshore book and is willing to leave the country’s protection behind.

Betcha

Betcha is the other TAB NZ online brand, and a punter who has decided to bet only with TAB NZ can hold accounts at both TAB and Betcha because the operator is one. The two brands share the verified-identity flow, the deposit limits, the time-outs, the self-exclusion, and the regulator. The difference between them is the product experience, the markets they push, and the look of the app. Betcha is presented as a sports-focused companion to TAB, with the racing heavy lifting on TAB and a broader sportsbook on Betcha.

For a Kiwi punter who wants a sportsbook first and a racing book second, Betcha is the right place to start. For a Kiwi punter whose bet is on a horse race, TAB is the right place. The brand is not a rival to TAB and the comparison table does not put them in competition; they are two front doors to one licence, and the punter’s choice between them is about which door has the right product for the bet.

A punt on Betcha that loses is settled at the brand’s published odds; a punt on Betcha that wins is paid out into the same TAB NZ wallet, subject to the same deposit limits and the same self-exclusion. The cost of moving from TAB to Betcha, in other words, is zero on the regulatory ledger and minimal on the product one. A punter who has only used TAB can try Betcha without giving up any of the country’s framework.

The offshore crypto books a Kiwi punter meets

Telbet

Telbet describes itself as a crypto casino and sportsbook, with a welcome offer of 200% up to 1 BTC plus 50 free spins and a 5 USDT free bet on its Russian-language site. Crypto settlement only; no NZD on the deposit rail. The brand names no licence that applies in New Zealand, no New Zealand payment rail, and no New Zealand complaints route. The wagering factor, the minimum price, the market margin, and the deadline on the welcome offer live in the brand’s own terms, and a Kiwi punter who wants to know what the bonus actually costs reads those terms before depositing.

The verdict on Telbet is plain. A Kiwi punter who has decided to bet offshore has picked a brand with a heavy headline bonus, a heavy wagering requirement implicit in any 200%-plus offer, and a regulatory frame that ends at the licence the brand names. The brand suits a punter who is comfortable in a crypto-only environment, who has read the terms, and who accepts that the New Zealand harm-minimisation framework is not theirs. It is not a recommendation for a Kiwi punter who prioritises the country’s protection.

Winz

Winz states in its footer that it holds a licence delivered by Anjouan and Tobique. The brand’s own terms state withdrawal caps and game-weighting rules, and a Kiwi punter reads those terms to know what the bonus structure costs. No New Zealand payment rail, no New Zealand complaints route. The brand’s crypto settlement is on Bitcoin and a range of altcoins; the wallet is the wallet, the bonus is the bonus, the terms are the terms.

The honest reading of Winz is the honest reading of any offshore brand: the licence is what the licence is, the terms are what the terms are, the New Zealand framework does not reach the brand, and a Kiwi punter who has decided to bet offshore has accepted that frame. The brand suits a punter who has already done the cross-jurisdiction reading and who has decided Anjouan-and-Tobique is the licence they want. It is not a site for a punter who has not.

Rooster

Rooster is operated by Novatrix SRL, a company incorporated in Costa Rica with registration number 3-102-893958, under e-gaming licence No. 0000002 issued by the Tobique Gaming Commission. The brand names a Tobique licence, holds the brand in Costa Rica, and runs a crypto sportsbook and casino. NZD is not listed on the deposit options; the deposit rail is crypto. No New Zealand complaints route.

Rooster’s terms state withdrawal caps and bonus conditions. The brand suits a Kiwi punter who is comfortable with a Tobique licence and a Costa Rica company, who has read the terms, and who accepts the regulatory frame. A punter who has not read the Tobique Gaming Commission’s framework has not read the licence they are betting under.

Thunderpick

Thunderpick is owned and operated by Paloma Media B.V., a Curaçao company with company number 146988, licensed by the Curaçao Gaming Authority under licence number OGL/2024/677/0722. The brand is positioned around esports and sports betting, with crypto settlement. No New Zealand complaints route.

Thunderpick is the brand for a punter whose primary market is esports. The Curaçao licence is the licence, the terms are the terms, and a Kiwi punter who has decided esports is the bet reads the brand’s esports depth before reading the licence. The honest reading of Thunderpick is that the Curaçao framework is well-understood in the industry and well-known for its limits; the brand is not “more legitimate” for holding it, but it is also not “less legitimate” for not holding a New Zealand one. The frame is what it is.

Roobet

Roobet is a brand name of Raw Entertainment B.V., registration number 157205, Korporaalweg 10, Curaçao, licensed under Curaçao licence OGL/2024/687/0427. The brand is a crypto casino and sportsbook, with crypto deposit and withdrawal only. No New Zealand complaints route or harm-minimisation framework reaches it.

Roobet is the offshore brand with the highest household-name recognition in the crypto-betting market, and the highest marketing budget. The licence is Curaçao, the brand is Curaçao, the terms are Curaçao’s, and a Kiwi punter who has decided to bet at Roobet has accepted that frame. The brand suits a punter who knows what they are getting, has read the terms, and accepts the cost of doing so. It is a poor fit for a punter who confuses household-name recognition with regulatory standing in New Zealand.

What a Kiwi punter actually does, in order

The order a sensible first bet takes

The sensible order a first bet takes, in New Zealand, is short. Open a TAB NZ account with a verified New Zealand address and ID, set a deposit limit the day the account opens rather than the week the account starts to slip, fund the account by the deposit rail the terms list, place the bet on a market the betting rules name, and settle the result inside the TAB NZ app. The harm-minimisation framework is in place from the first deposit. The self-exclusion is a phone call to the helpline if the punter needs it.

A Kiwi punter who has decided to bet offshore has a longer list, and the list is mostly reading. Read the licence the brand names, read the responsible-gambling page the brand publishes, read the bonus terms on the welcome offer the brand advertises, check the deposit and withdrawal limits in the brand’s own terms, and decide whether the brand’s framework is the framework the punter wants. Then fund the wallet, place the bet, and settle the result in the brand’s app. The harm-minimisation frame is whatever the brand publishes, not the country’s.

Where the order stalls

The order stalls at three predictable places. The first is identity verification at TAB NZ: a New Zealand punter without a verified NZ address cannot open an account, and the verification can take longer than the punter expects on a Friday night. The second is withdrawal at an offshore book: a brand that takes deposits in minutes can take days to approve a withdrawal, and the punter who has not checked the terms learns the cost of withdrawal at the moment they try. The third is bonus settlement: a welcome offer that pays out only after a turnover requirement has been met, on bets at or above a minimum price, on markets that exclude the bet the punter wanted to place, is a bonus the punter cannot clear.

What it looks like when the order works

When the order works, a TAB NZ punter places a bet, watches it on the app, gets the result in real time, and sees the winnings in the wallet. The deposit limit holds because the punter set it before they needed it, and the self-exclusion is there if the punter ever does. An offshore punter who has done the reading places the bet, gets the result in the app, withdraws in the coin they deposited in, and accepts the regulatory frame they chose. The cost of moving money is the network fee and the coin’s price move; the cost of moving from the bet to the winnings is whatever the brand’s terms say.

Frequently Asked Questions

How does crypto betting work at the technology layer?

A crypto deposit is a transfer of ownership of a coin recorded on a public blockchain, where every block is stamped with the cryptographic hash of the one before it. Bitcoin’s ledger began on 3 January 2009 when its pseudonymous creator, Satoshi Nakamoto, mined the genesis block. The transfer settles without a bank in the middle, which is why crypto books can serve customers in jurisdictions card networks will not. The deposit rail is pseudonymous rather than anonymous: the ledger is public, and the link between address and person is whatever chain-analytics can reconstruct.

Which payment methods does TAB NZ accept, and where are they listed?

TAB NZ’s deposit methods and limits come from the brand’s own terms; no New Zealand statutory rule on payment methods for betting accounts was found. The deposit rails at TAB NZ are the New Zealand retail-banking methods a Kiwi punter already has, and the brand does not offer a crypto deposit rail. The full list lives in the TAB NZ app and on the brand’s deposit page; limits change with the product and the punter reads the current terms before funding.

Which bookmaker may lawfully take sports and racing bets in New Zealand?

TAB NZ is the only provider lawfully offering racing and sports betting to people in New Zealand since the amendment to the Racing Industry Act 2020 took effect on 28 June 2025. TAB and Betcha are the two online brands of TAB NZ, run by Entain under a 25-year agreement signed in 2023. There is no licence to apply for and no licence register for bookmakers, because there is only one lawful provider. The Online Casino Gambling Act 2026 licenses online casino gambling only and does not license sports betting.

What does a player lose by betting with a bookmaker that has no New Zealand licence?

The player does not lose the freedom to place the bet: section 19(4) of the Gambling Act 2003, inserted in 2025, says an individual may not be convicted for placing a bet with an offshore betting operator in breach of section 74AAA, and no published penalty for a player was found. What the player loses is the New Zealand protections: the verified-age account, the deposit limit that the operator must honour, the time-out and self-exclusion tools that work across the brand, the regulator the player can complain to, and the harm-minimisation framework paid for by the Problem Gambling Levy.

From what age can bets be placed with TAB NZ, and what is checked when opening an account?

The age for TAB NZ betting is 18; betting under 18 is an offence under section 89 of the Racing Industry Act 2020. TAB NZ accounts need a verified New Zealand address and ID, which is the practical way the age floor is enforced. Land-based casinos are 20 — a different number, a different licence class, never the same thing. A punter who cannot verify a New Zealand address cannot open an account at TAB NZ.

Are betting winnings taxed in New Zealand?

Inland Revenue guidance says recreational gambling winnings are generally not taxable, and prize money from TAB horse, dog and trotting races is not taxable. A person who bets as a business is a different case. The Inland Revenue treatment of cryptoassets themselves is separate: disposal of cryptoassets by individuals, including selling, swapping for another token, or spending them on goods or services, is a chargeable event for Capital Gains Tax. A winning crypto bet paid into a wallet, and then a swap of that coin into New Zealand dollars to spend it, can be two taxable events. The general information is not tax advice; a bettor who bets enough that the amounts start to matter will consult Inland Revenue or an accountant.

Created by the ”Nzbankbets” editorial team.